EDITORIAL GUIDANCE Criteria stated, not a measured ranking
Prepare materials with a visible review process
Define a useful outcome
Prepare materials with a visible review process
Start with learning objectives and approved sources. Review generated examples, accessibility and factual accuracy. Keep authorship discussions separate from automated detector judgments.
A repeatable workflow
Write down the input, expected output and acceptance criteria.
Choose two candidates from the relevant shortlist.
Run the same representative task in each.
Review accuracy, correction time and repeatability.
Keep the result and revisit the decision when the task changes.