DAILY BRIEFBetter questions, better AI decisions: read the sample edition →HUMANRANK.AI
HumanRank.ai
Daily Brief
RESEARCH PROTOCOL

Research and benchmark protocol

EDITORIAL RECORD Publication policy and method

HumanRank’s first benchmark program is specified but has not been run. The protocol below defines the evidence required before the site publishes measured rankings.

HumanRank’s first benchmark program is specified but has not been run. The protocol below defines the evidence required before the site publishes measured rankings.

Choose a bounded question

Start with a specific decision: which tool completes a defined coding change, preserves claims in a rewrite or finds sources for a research question. Avoid a universal score assembled from unrelated tasks.

Construct and freeze the task set

Use representative inputs, record provenance and retain difficult cases. Freeze the scored set before examining results. Keep development examples separate from evaluation examples.

Run and retain

Save model versions, prompts, settings, timestamps, raw outputs, errors, cost and latency. Include failed runs in the denominator. Use repeated runs and paired tasks when appropriate.

Review and publish

Blind reviewers to product identity when feasible. Publish the rubric, per-task data, aggregation script and limitations. Report uncertain differences honestly; a reproducible calculation is not proof that the underlying experiment was unbiased.

Search HumanRank

Browse the catalog or type to search.

ESC TO CLOSE · Open full search →

HumanRank.ai
THE DAILY BRIEFExplore the brief →